Since announcement of presence of acrylamide in processed foods by University of Stockholm and National Food Administration of Sweden at a press conference in 24 April 2002, we have recognized this issue as a substantial matter of food safety and started analysis of acrylamide in processed foods in Japan by LC-MS/MS and GC-MS. Here we report the methods and results of the analyses on 63 samples covering 31 product types.
| HPLC | |
| apparatus | Nanospace SI-2 (Shiseido, Tokyo, Japan) |
| column | Atlantis dC18 (2.1 x 150 mm,3 オm, Waters, MA, USA) |
| pre-column | OptiGuard mini C18 (1.0 x 15 mm, Optimize Technologies, OR, USA) |
| solvent | 10 % MeOH |
| flow rate | 100 オL/min |
| injection volume | 2 オL |
| column temperature | 40 ーC |
| retention time | 5.4 min |
| recording time | 12 min (4.8・0.2 min to MS) |
| MS | |
| apparatus | API 3000 (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) |
| ionization | ESI+ |
| detection | SRM (acrylamide m/z 72->55, internal standard m/z 75->58) |
| ion source | TurboIonSpray |
| nebulizer gas flow | 4 |
| curtain gas flow | 10 |
| ion source temp | 450 ーC |
| ion spray voltage | 5200 V |
| orifice voltage | 26 V |
| dwell time | 95 msec |
| pause time | 5 msec |
| acquisition duration | 10 min |
| limit of detection | 0.2 ng/mL (5 fmol) |
| limit of quantitation | 0.8 ng/mL (22 fmol) |
| apparatus | QP2010 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) |
| column | CP-Sil 24 CB (0.25 mm i.d. x 30 m, 0.25 オm film thickness, Varian, CA, USA) |
| carrier gas | He |
| flow rate | 1.43 mL/min |
| injection volume | 1 オL |
| injection temperature | 120 ーC |
| temp. program | 85 ーC (1 min) ・(25 ーC/min)・75 ーC (6 min) ・(40 ーC/min)・50 ーC (7.52 min) |
| retention time | 8.1 min |
| acquisition duration | 16 min |
| ionization | EI+ (70 eV) |
| detection | SIM (acrylamide m/z 150 & 152, internal standard m/z 153 & 155) |
| interface temp. | 280ーC |
| ion source temp. | 200ーC |
| limit of detection | 12 ng/mL (52 fmol) as 2,3-dibromopropanamide |
| limit of quantitation | 40 ng/mL (170 fmol) as 2,3-dibromopropanamide |
These analyses were carried out on single randomly selected samples from supermarkets. It is highly likely that there are variations in acrylamide concentration among production lots and among foods within a product type due to difference in the processing condition. Survey over wider range of foods with larger number of samples including home cooked foods is necessary for risk assessment.